You know how the politicians are always saying we need to be competitive with China? Well, we are about to get super competitive when it comes to internal censorship of the global Internet.Everybody except for a handful of malcontent “privacy activists” is behind the bold new plan to make all Internet service providers in the United States turn off any domainwithin five days, if Washington says “turn it off.” As usual, this new legislation is cloaked in bullshit terminology about copyright and lost profits for media conglomerates, but the result is exactly the same as China’s “great firewall” — except, this being the land of “corporations are people, my friends,” the ISPs will be responsible for the dirty work instead of some top-level government technological agency. Via Cryptogon, here’s the relevant chunk of the legislation: A service provider shall take technically feasible and reasonable measures designed to prevent access by its subscribers located within the United States to the foreign infringing site (or portion thereof) that is subject to the order, including measures designed to prevent the domain name of the foreign infringing site (or portion thereof) from resolving to that domain name’s Internet Protocol address. Such actions shall be taken as expeditiously as possible, but in any case within 5 days after being served with a copy of the order, or within such time as the court may order. How? The whole Internet domain system requires a constantly updated Domain Name Server database that connects your computer to whatever server holds your “Tranny Hunter” porn or Communist Revolution/Buffy slash-fiction forum. Your ISP might be Verizon or AT&T for your “smart phone” or it might be dial-up AOL for confused old people who still have $9.95 a month charged to their Discover card. Either way, the ISP “resolves” the domain name you’re trying to reach with the computer servers that have that content, wherever it might be. (All you actual tech people in the comments can correct this if necessary.) So when the Government sends a “turn off these domains” order to your ISP, the ISP will have no choice but to block the offending websites. Problem solved! You know they’ve been working on this feverishly since the WikiLeaks outrage, right? Here’s a Forbes blog post that explains just how the law will be used: The PROTECT IP Act would allow copyright owners – movie studios and other content providers – simply to accuse a website of infringement, which could lead to that site being shut down by court order and entire links to the site being wiped clean from the Internet. Any website with a hyperlink, such as Twitter, Facebook or a blog, would be subject to liability. More, non-infringing sites could be inadvertently shut down under the proposal. Indeed, the law is so far-reaching that it would force Internet providers like Comcast to block all access to the allegedly illegal site. The potential for abuse by the notoriously litigious content industry is clear. Last year, when the government sought to shut down one child pornography site, it ended up affecting some 70,000 legitimate sites for several days, even notifying visitors that the sites – many of which were business sites – were purveyors of child pornography. For instance, the bill is so broadly written that, in theory, it would allow any copyright owner to shut down a legitimate retail website, such as Amazon or Best Buy, by alleging that one product being sold on the site could “enable or facilitate” an infringement. But in practice, it won’t be giant business websites like Amazon that get the plug pulled. It will be the little guys, the alternative press, the OccupyWhatever sites, anything that gets in the way of the Internet’s actual role in America: retail advertising and shoe shopping and lonely online pursuits shown to lower people’s actual engagement with the world, like sport teams or pornography or gadget blogs or orc-battle games or anything shit out by the Murdoch empire of diversions. Oh well. It was really an aberration that the Internet functioned as openly as it has these past two decades. But that era is already over, as proven by the U.K. national police shutting down mobile messaging during the summer riots or, just two months ago, San Francisco’s BART stations easily turning off all the cell phone signals within the stations to prevent protesters from organizing an action there against police brutality. [Cryptogon/Forbes/Reuters]
HOLY FUCKING SHIT
This is dubbed fucking perfectly, hahahah
The US Senate’s website was hacked over the weekend, leading to a review of all of its websites, in the latest embarrassing breach of security to hit a major US-based institution. Lulz Security, a loosely organised hacker group, broke into a public portion of the Senate website but did not reach behind a firewall into a more sensitive portion of the network, Martina Bradford, the deputy Senate sergeant at arms, said on Monday. Despite the breach, the sergeant at arms office, which provides security for the Senate, said that the breach had not compromised any individual senator’s information. Lulz Security announced the hack on Monday. “We were responding to their allegations. Basically what we’re saying that the server they got into is for public access and is in the public side,” Bradford said. Lulz Security, which has previously claimed to have hacked into Sony’s website and the US Public Broadcasting System (PBS), posted online a list of files that appear not to be sensitive but indicate the hackers had been into the Senate’s computer network. “We don’t like the US government very much,” Lulz Security said at the top of their release. The comment refers to reports that the US military had decided that it could respond to cyber attacks from foreign countries with traditional military force. Senate staffers were alerted about the breach late on Monday. “Although this intrusion is inconvenient, it does not compromise the security of the Senate’s network, its members or staff,” Bradford said in a statement. “Specifically, there is no individual user account information on the server supporting senate.gov that could have been compromised.” Stewart Baker, a former cyber official at the Department of Homeland Security, said: “The hackers may have done the equivalent of burglarising the Senate and bragging because they managed to steal a bunch of souvenirs from the gift shop.” ‘Especially embarrassing’ The Senate has been the frequent target of hacking attacks, with tens of thousands thwarted each month, Senate sergeant at arms Terrance Gainer told the Reuters news agency in early June. The break-in is just the latest in a series of embarrassing hacks against companies and organisations. The International Monetary Fund has been hit, as have Lockheed Martin Corp, Citigroup Inc, Google and Michaels Stores. The break-in would cause embarrassment at the Senate, John Bumgarner of the US Cyber Consequences Unit think tank, said. “They’re all valid directories,” he said after looking at data that Lulz posted online. “The information disclosed online … shows that the intruders had administrator-level access to the Senate server. This access could have potentially been used as a jump-off point to compromise other systems in the network,” he said. ‘Laugh out loud’ Lulz, which is internet slang for ‘laugh out loud,’ has claimed hacks into websites owned by Sony Corp. It has also claimed responsibility for defacing the PBS network websites, and for posting on Monday data from PBS servers to protest a “Front Line” documentary about WikiLeaks. Lulz claimed credit for breaking into a Fox.com website and publishing data about contestants for the upcoming Fox TV talent show, “X Factor”. Another loosely affiliated hacking group, Anonymous, gained prominence when it temporarily crippled the websites of MasterCard, Visa and PayPal after they cut off financial services to WikiLeaks. It has also attacked websites in Syria, Tunisia, Egypt and India for political reasons.
“This is a small, just-for-kicks release of some internal data from Senate.gov - is this an act of war, gentlemen? Problem?”
“This is an especially embarrassing incident for the US Senate, because they are often asking others to explain why their cybersecurity programmes have failed.
(Source: english.aljazeera.net)
-
shibbity bop
im gonna mop (*whispers* the floor with u)

-
sketchbook page
drew a bunch of animals who think they’re people and then was for whatever reason stricken with the impulse to write “pussy” over...
-
team-reverie asked: Hey Nao! Where does the name "Naoren" come from? Like how'd you come up with it, or Naorui, Naoraji, etc?
Well when I started this blog, the original characters were a Kirlia and Sneasel named Naomi and Ruin respectively.
Naomi was meant to answer...
-
See guys? The Xbox One just needed a little vintage finish on it. It’s not that bad.
-
Felix holding a wee dude!
…and off to bed. My eyes are prolly cross eyed by now, can’t really see straight.
-
This whole situation is a thing that should be remembered I’m tagging this shit
-
female-mewtwo asked: You really have to get that worked up over some comment by someone I'd hate to see what would happen if he called your mother something. Manage your anger bro, killing someone doesn't solve shit.

-
Anonymous asked: Guess it's obvious you're still under the age limit of the internet. Why don't you just ignore them and go about your own business instead of making it your own to scream and complain just like they are.
What the fuck did you just fucking say about me, you little bitch? I’ll have you know I graduated top of my class in the Navy Seals, and I’ve been...